Index: ossp-pkg/srpc/TODO
RCS File: /v/ossp/cvs/ossp-pkg/srpc/TODO,v
rcsdiff -q -kk '-r1.10' '-r1.11' -u '/v/ossp/cvs/ossp-pkg/srpc/TODO,v' 2>/dev/null
--- TODO	2001/07/31 15:34:06	1.10
+++ TODO	2001/07/31 15:45:14	1.11
@@ -44,6 +44,15 @@
                              [u]string,octets}
   - regression tests for libxds (make check)
 
+ - 16bit Integers mean trouble when passing them through "...":
+
+     | xdr-encode-uint16.c:46: `xds_uint16_t' is promoted to `int' when passed through `...'
+     | xdr-encode-uint16.c:46: (so you should pass `int' not `xds_uint16_t' to `va_arg')
+
+   Maybe we should skip int16 support at all? Currently I work around
+   this problem by implicitely assuming that the short is promoted to
+   an int.
+
   - XML: <int32>1234</int32>
          uint32, int64, uint64,
 
Index: ossp-pkg/xds/TODO
RCS File: /v/ossp/cvs/ossp-pkg/xds/Attic/TODO,v
rcsdiff -q -kk '-r1.10' '-r1.11' -u '/v/ossp/cvs/ossp-pkg/xds/Attic/TODO,v' 2>/dev/null
--- TODO	2001/07/31 15:34:06	1.10
+++ TODO	2001/07/31 15:45:14	1.11
@@ -44,6 +44,15 @@
                              [u]string,octets}
   - regression tests for libxds (make check)
 
+ - 16bit Integers mean trouble when passing them through "...":
+
+     | xdr-encode-uint16.c:46: `xds_uint16_t' is promoted to `int' when passed through `...'
+     | xdr-encode-uint16.c:46: (so you should pass `int' not `xds_uint16_t' to `va_arg')
+
+   Maybe we should skip int16 support at all? Currently I work around
+   this problem by implicitely assuming that the short is promoted to
+   an int.
+
   - XML: <int32>1234</int32>
          uint32, int64, uint64,