|
Check-in Number:
|
484 | |
| Date: |
2001-May-22 16:45:31 (local)
2001-May-22 14:45:31 (UTC) |
| User: | rse |
| Branch: | |
| Comment: |
*** empty log message *** |
| Tickets: |
|
| Inspections: |
|
| Files: |
|
ossp-pkg/srpc/EVAL -> 1.1
*** /dev/null Fri May 17 10:15:21 2024
--- - Fri May 17 10:15:22 2024
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,53 ----
+
+ Evaluation
+ ==========
+
+ o Spread
+ http://www.spread.org/
+
+ o XML-RPC:
+ http://www.xmlrpc.org/
+ http://www.focusresearch.com/gregor/sw/XPC/
+ http://xmlrpc-c.sourceforge.net/
+
+ o SunRPC
+ rfc1050.txt
+ rfc1057.txt
+ rfc1790.txt
+ rfc1831.txt
+ rfc1833.txt
+ rfc2203.txt
+ rfc2695.txt
+
+ o SRA
+ Secure RPC Authentication for TELNET and FTP
+ net.tamu.edu:pub/security/TAMU/
+
+ o RPC2
+ ftp://ftp.coda.cs.cmu.edu/pub/rpc2/
+
+ o MRPC
+ http://www.tildeslash.org/mrpc.html
+ http://www.tildeslash.org/mrpc/
+
+ o LinuxDoors
+ http://www.rampant.org/doors/
+
+ o DCERPC
+ ftp://gatekeeper.dec.com/pub/DEC/DCE/
+
+ RSE:
+ ----
+
+ ORBit ...... nice ORBit 2.2 implementation in C, but undocumented
+ FreeBSD .... the most clean RPC, but only RPCv1
+ SunRPC40 ... too old, FreeBSD's code is much more feature-full and portable, RPCv1
+ NetBSD ..... very similar to FreeBSD code with a few addons "long long", but less clean, RPCv1
+ tirpc ...... Transport Layer Independent RPC, but unportable and old
+ RPC2 ....... nice concept, but neither RPCv1 nor RPC2 and requires LWP library
+ and is also bundled strongly with it
+ MRPC ....... modular architecture (tranport layer interchangeable), but
+ depends on re2c and is implemented in cpp, neither RPCv1 nor RPCv2
+ XMLRPC ..... taugt nicht, nur nettes Konzept, keine C Implementierung,
+ starker Overhead, etc.
+
|
|
